Pages

Wednesday 30 November 2016

Google & Bing increase the file size limit of Sitemaps files

While the 50,000 URL limit has not changed, your Sitemaps file size can now be up to 50MB.

Both Google and Bing announced jointly that they have increased the file size limit of Sitemaps files from 10MB to 50MB.
That means, the uncompressed version must now be under 50MB, no longer under 10MB.
Fabrice Canel, Principal Program Manager at Bing, said “while most sitemaps are under this 10 MB file limit, these days, our systems occasionally encounter sitemaps exceeding this limit.” “Most often this is caused when sitemap files list very long URLs or if they have attributes listing long extra URLs (as alternate language URLs, Image URLs, etc), which inflates the size of the sitemap file,” he added.
The 50,000 URL limit per Sitemaps file has not changed, you can still only have up to 50,000 URLs in a single Sitemap file. But the file size has increased significantly.
Here is Google’s tweet about that this morning: 

We've updated the Sitemaps protocol with Bing! Sitemaps & indexes can be considerably larger now. More at http://sitemaps.org 

To know more latest update or tips about Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Search Engine Marketing (SEM) - Fill ContactUs Form or call at +44 2032892236 or Email us at - adviser.illusiongroups@gmail.com


Tuesday 29 November 2016

MarTech Conference series adds Boston event in 2017

Following significant growth in San Francisco, the marketing technology conference and trade show announces East Coast event

Search Engine Land publisher Third Door Media announced today that it will produce an East coast edition of MarTech®: The Marketing Tech Conference at the Hynes Convention Center in Boston October 2-4, 2017. A West coast edition of MarTech will take place in San Francisco May 9-11, 2017.
“Marketers are implementing technologies at a breakneck pace in order to improve customer experience, and that’s having profound effects on marketing operations and management. Attending MarTech is an efficient way to evaluate new technologies and learn best practices for implementing and managing them.”
-Chris Elwell, CEO of Third Door Media
MarTech is programmed by conference chair, Scott Brinker. Brinker is a marketing technology industry luminary, author of Hacking Marketing: Agile Practices to Make Marketing Smarter, Faster, and More Innovative, and editor of the popular chiefmartec.com blog.
“We’re incredibly excited to bring the MarTech conference to Boston. The Northeast Corridor is a thriving ecosystem of marketing innovation at agencies, brands, and software companies. Our mission is to bring that community together for a vendor-agnostic, graduate-level event that advances practices at the intersection of marketing, technology, and management,” Brinker said.
MarTech is the largest independent marketing technology event. The 2016 San Francisco edition attracted more than 2000 marketing technology professionals and nearly 100 exhibitors and sponsors. Attendance and vendor participation is expected to increase by at least 50% this year.
Companies that want to exhibit or sponsor either MarTech event should contact us here. Registration for MarTech Boston conference attendees will open in April 2017.

To know more latest update or tips about Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Search Engine Marketing (SEM) - Fill ContactUs Form or call at +44 2032892236 or Email us at - adviser.illusiongroups@gmail.com

Are you doing attribution wrong?

Nothing is more top-of-mind for marketers than attribution. It’s a complex topic, and there are lots of questions.
This guide from AdRoll examines the history of attribution models and dives deep into platform data, third-party research and advertiser survey data to make the case for marketers to adopt a blended attribution model, one that combines both ad views and clicks.
Visit Digital Marketing Depot to download “The Blended Attribution Playbook” to learn more.
To know more latest update or tips about Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Search Engine Marketing (SEM) - Fill ContactUs Form or call at +44 2032892236 or Email us at - adviser.illusiongroups@gmail.com

Monday 28 November 2016

Ad customizers just got a whole lot more powerful

Columnist Frederick Vallaeys discusses the new capabilities of ad customizers in AdWords, explaining how you can use them to serve better, more relevant ads.


I’m always looking for an edge in PPC so that my campaign’s performance will shine in a very competitive landscape. Back in 2013, I started talking about how to use programming to set up time-saving and performance-boosting automations with AdWords Scripts, at the time among the newest capabilities in AdWords. But now that we’re about to head into 2017, there’s an entirely different AdWords power feature that is starting to let us use programming to improve performance: ad customizers (“customizers” for short).
Customizers sit at the intersection of two of my favorite topics: feed-based advertising and programming. I’ll cover some innovative ways to use the older feed-based capabilities, but I’ll also cover some of the brand-new programming-based ways to use the feature to show different ads based on the device or the audience list a user is on.

Ad customizers just got new capabilities

The customizers’ capabilities that have now been available for a few years are most easily thought of as a very powerful variant of dynamic keyword insertion (DKI). Rather than just giving advertisers the ability to insert the keyword into the ad, any piece of text can be inserted from a spreadsheet that is maintained in the Business Data section of AdWords.

The brand-new customizer capabilities use simple functions and code to customize the text. For example, there is a function to show a countdown timer, as well as a brand-new IF function (not yet available in all accounts). These IF statements can be used to do different things depending on certain conditions, like the device a user is on or an audience list the user is a member of.

Ad customizers reduce account complexity

One of the advantages of customizers is that they reduce the need to maintain multiple campaigns when you want to slightly vary the messaging depending on different conditions. For example, while you could achieve the same by maintaining two campaigns — one for smartphones and one for computers — you can use customizers to show different ads while still using just a single campaign. This can be desirable when you’re close to hitting account size limits, or when you want to simplify account management (e.g., no need to add a new keyword in two places).

Ad customizers can now use default fallback text

Besides the new “IF” function in customizers, another welcome new addition is the availability of default text. In the past, any ad groups using ad customizers required the use of a fallback ad that didn’t use customizers. For advertisers doing manual A/B ad testing, this made things complicated because in addition to calculating winners and losers, they also had to account for the fact that if the fallback ad was deleted, the entire ad group would no longer be eligible to serve ads. And while it’s relatively easy to identify ad groups with no active ads (in Editor, for example), it’s much harder to find ad groups that are effectively in the same boat, not because there are no ads, but because there are only ad customizer ads.
Now you can include a default insertion when using customizers, making it unnecessary to write a fallback ad. Just like with the default text for DKI, if a particular dynamic insertion makes the ad too long, the default will be used instead.
The format to include default text is just the same as for DKI: simply add a colon and the default before the closing curly bracket, e.g., {=DataSetName.AttributeName:Default Text}.

Show a countdown timer

The countdown feature shows how much time remains, for example, before the end of a special promotion, or the last time to qualify for free shipping before Christmas. As the end date nears, the countdown will go from saying how many days are left to how many hours, and eventually, how many minutes, e.g., “3 days,” “5 hours,” “10 mins.” The feature works in all languages and can optionally be set to only start showing a countdown as you get relatively close to the end date — a useful feature, since saying that there are “just 50 days left before Christmas” isn’t likely to instill any real sense of urgency and may quite possibly have the opposite effect.
The feature can count down based on your account time zone, which is useful if you’re running a contest and there is a global cutoff time for submissions (e.g., the contest closes at midnight Central European Time, regardless of where in the world the participant is located).
To use this, insert {=GLOBAL_COUNTDOWN(“2016/11/30 13:30:00″,”en-US”,5)} into your ad. The date refers to the end date, “en-US” refers to the language to insert into the text, and the number 5 tells the system to only start the countdown when there are five or fewer days left before the end.
By default, the countdown is based on the time zone of the user and would look like this in your ad: {=COUNTDOWN(“2016/11/30 13:30:00″,”en-US”,5)}
The easiest way to set this up correctly is to use the ad builder interface on the AdWords website.

While you can run this feature without the need for a business data spreadsheet, you can optionally set the end date in the spreadsheet and then reference it in the ad as follows: {=COUNTDOWN(AdCustomizerFeed.Date, ‘es’, 3)}, where “AdCustomizerFeed.Date” refers to the business data file, followed by a dot and the column header in the spreadsheet that contains the date.

Show device-specific ads

As I explained in my recent column about what elements make the perfect Expanded Text Ad, there is actually a way to show different ETAs on mobile devices and on desktops. It’s done by adding two rows to Business Data, one that includes the text for mobile devices and another that contains the text for non-mobile devices. The reality of using this is that it’s a lot of extra work to maintain an entire spreadsheet with the text variations when the only thing you’re trying to do is show device-specific ads.

As I mentioned in my last post, Google was working on an easier alternative, and now we know what this is: “IF functions” in Customizers. The concept is very simple: you specify an IF condition, and then write the desired text for when that condition is met.
Here’s an example from Google:
{=IF(device=mobile,text to insert):optional default text}
The text “optional default text” is really the text you want to show when the user is not on a mobile device, so here’s how I would formulate that same example:
{=IF(device=mobile,hello mobile user):hello desktop user}

Show audience-specific ads

Another brand-new capability that comes with using IF functions in Customizers is to use it to vary the ads for different audiences. Until now, showing different ads for different audiences required creating separate ad groups, each with a different audience target and a unique ad text. Now it is possible to maintain both different bids and different ads within a single ad group, which reduces the need to bloat an account with extra structure.
Just as with device-specific ads, the syntax for audience specific ads looks as follows:
{=IF(audience IN(returning visitors,cart abandoners),30%):25%}
“returning visitors,cart abandoners” is a comma-separated list of audience names.

Show product-driven ads

Jason Puckett gave a good overview recently of how to turn an e-commerce feed into relevant ads . This is basically using Customizers as a super-advanced variant of DKI. It’s a concept we’ve taken even a step further at my company, Optmyzr, to allow not only ads, but also ad group names and keywords to be generated on the fly based on spreadsheet data.
One issue we commonly see at Optmyzr is that merchant center data feeds are not well-suited to dynamic ad generation because the title and description fields are too long for use in ads, and there are often not enough product attributes to make it easy to create a good ad from a template. However, with a bit of thought about the templated structure that ads should follow, it’s usually possible to create a new spreadsheet of data that will be well suited for this task.

Show location-specific ads

Customizers also have targeting attributes which let you do different things in different scenarios that depend on any of the targeting options shown in this table from Google:

One way to use this is to show different ad variations in different locations without requiring entirely new campaigns that target each location.
A nice example would be for a same-day plumbing service. Customizer data could be used to maintain a list of how quickly a plumber could show up to different cities. Rather than maintaining the times in hard-coded ads, now the time can be dynamically inserted from the business data.

Schedule business data to be updated

When using customizers to keep ads in sync with inventory, service times and other elements that may change frequently, it’s probably a good idea to schedule the data to be automatically uploaded to Google.

Data can be sent to Google automatically as often as every six hours, and the source can be a Google Sheet or a file on your web or FTP server.
By using a Google Sheet as the source, now even a non-technical person who doesn’t know how to upload files to FTP or a web server can be put in charge of periodically updating the inventory in an easy-to-use tool like Sheets to have that automatically uploaded to change the ads.

Show different ads at different hours

Another nice capability of Customizers is to connect them with ad schedules. One of the standard attributes is for ad schedules. Here is the full list of standard attributes from Google:

Rather than maintaining both ads as separate entities, now you can use Business Data to mix things up. For example, you could put two variations of headline 2 in a spreadsheet, and then call it dynamically in the ad using something like this: {=MyData.headline2:default headline 2 text}.

Conclusion

Ad customizers are far more powerful than most advertisers realize (except for Matt Umbro), and with new capabilities like default insertion text, IF functions for devices and for audiences, and automated upload schedules for business data, the power of this feature has dramatically increased and can help us show even more relevant ads than before.
To know more latest update or tips about Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Search Engine Marketing (SEM) - Fill ContactUs Form or call at +44 2032892236 or Email us at - adviser.illusiongroups@gmail.com

Sunday 27 November 2016

Looking for Black Friday deals? Bing flyer ads showcase retailers’ Black Friday circulars

Bing has reprised its Black Friday flyer ads this year, though this time with a different take.
Last year’s flyer ads displayed on searches for some retailers and linked to flyers hosted by Flipp. In the 2016 version, the flyer ads appear in a carousel on desktop searches for general Black Friday-related terms. The individual ads featured in the carousel each link to the Black Friday landing page on the respective retailers’ websites.
Here is an example of a flyer ad that includes spots for Sam’s Club, Target, Kohl’s, Best Buy and Brooks Running in the initial panel.

Black Friday flyer ad carousel on Bing.
Flipp is among the advertisers included farther down the carousel and links to Black Friday circulars tailored to your location on its site. The ads do not appear to be triggering at this point on retailer brand searches, or in mobile search results or the Bing app.
To know more latest update or tips about Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Search Engine Marketing (SEM) - Fill ContactUs Form or call at +44 2032892236 or Email us at - adviser.illusiongroups@gmail.com


Saturday 26 November 2016

How do our biases impact PPC performance?

With experience comes wisdom, but columnist Brett Middleton believes that search marketers can sometimes limit themselves by clinging to old habits.


I’ve come to believe that the essence of PPC management can be boiled down to two things:
  1. Never let one thing (keyword research, bid management, A/B testing ad copy and so on) take up so much of your attention that you let something else slip.
  2. What you did yesterday probably needs to be changed, and failing to adapt your methodology is as bad as having an empty “Change History” log.
As you gain more experience in PPC, you start to develop patterns and favorite tactics out of necessity. We bring tools that worked in the past to each new campaign or ad account. People are paying us for our past experiences and how these experiences translate into future potential.
But are the things we believe about PPC the very things holding us back from fully optimizing an account?
I will absolutely agree with anyone out there who feels that the biases we develop in fact make us much more efficient in management. However, I would also say that our biases can hold us back.
Let’s take a look at a three examples. As you read along, consider your own management habits and how you may have sped up the process over the years.

Spare the Bing, spoil the Google

I personally have been guilty of neglecting Bing Ads. I let Bing Ads move in but made it live in the closet under the stairs (and, much as you would expect, it became a wizard).
Now, part of this was because Bing’s universal event tracking (UET) is much less intuitive, and we simply didn’t take the right steps to make sure revenue tracking was working perfectly. It’s Bing Ads! Do we really need to try that hard to get it going? Why can’t it just be more like Google? After a meeting in which we reviewed the UET code implementation and got Bing’s revenue tracking working correctly, I watched the results in horror/excitement.
Our Bing campaigns are operating at an ROAS five times higher than Google. The search volume isn’t as high, that’s absolutely true — but almost every campaign has been severely limited by budget because we just didn’t see it as worth a major investment.
Every time you have taken on a new client (or, if you’re in-house, every time you’ve evaluated your PPC for optimization paths) and have failed to do a significant test of Bing Ads, you have probably done yourself a disservice. Obviously, there are several reasons that this bias came to be.
Video Player
People think Bing Ads is less reliable than AdWords, want to find out if it’s any good, and are just generally wondering if it’s even worth trying. I’ve always said that these are all reasons you should be in Bing Ads. As marketers, don’t we dream of finding that converting channel that our competitors aren’t in?
Can we all agree to get on board here and give Bing Ads a shot? Unless you’re in my industry, in which case, just ignore all of this.

Separating match types

Now, I don’t have another 1,000 words to get into the question of whether or not you should segment your ad groups and campaigns by match type. (I don’t think you should — but if you must, do it at the campaign level, please! At least you can control the budget that goes to each match type that way.)
The fact is, you probably made the decision on separating or not separating match types fairly early in your PPC career; you very likely also made the decision after someone told you what to do. I was very opposed to separating by match-type, but my current campaigns do it at the campaign level. That’s fine with me for right now, although I cringe when I see the number of campaigns.
screen-shot-2016-11-16-at-9-48-41-am
I can’t stress enough that when people make recommendations, it’s based on their own experience and biases. Don’t let that be the factor that determines EXACTLY how you will manage PPC campaigns. Every piece of advice, including the words I’m writing now, should be examined and tested by yourself.
If you have always separated match types into different ad groups within a campaign, why don’t you try separating them into campaigns for a quarter, and then don’t separate them at all in the next quarter? Shake things up! Make your own decisions!
Very subtle, Google.
Very subtle, Google.
One thing I have learned from attending search marketing conferences is that there is always someone out there who knows more than you do, and he or she will say things that get you excited to go home and try them out. That is an incredible thing to experience.
You should always chase after something if it makes you excited about your job, but I caution you to always test each idea against your current philosophy. The tactics and strategies you learn should give you something not only to potentially mimic, but also to act as a catalyst for ideas of your own.

Ad copy formatting

Oh boy, here’s another place where I’m simply not going to dive deep into how you should write your ad copy; that’s is a big topic. But consider how you typically write ads. Do you…
  • include a CTA in the headline, or just give info?
  • use all caps in the description, or follow capitalization rules?
  • use URLslugs as another line of copy, or leave it blank?
  • keep it short and sweet, or use every single character available?
Don’t you think you should have a constantly evolving process that encourages testing and retesting (and then testing that again)? Ad copy isn’t always brilliant. It isn’t always right. But when you write something new, spend some time on it and change the way you do it. You’re absolutely not going to like each ad, but keep iterating.
00:00
02:44

Final thoughts

The very next thing you do when you log into your AdWords account (after importing it into Bing) should be to start testing what I’ve said here, and not just think about the specifics I outline. Evaluate your entire management strategy on a monthly basis, and look for gaps, testing areas, things you do that you have just… always done.
Pushing yourself and adapting is how you make a noticeable difference. Best of luck, PPC people!
To know more latest update or tips about Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Search Engine Marketing (SEM) - Fill ContactUs Form or call at +44 2032892236 or Email us at - adviser.illusiongroups@gmail.com

Friday 25 November 2016

Search in Pics: Google black friday cake, leather luggage tag & cupcakes

In this week’s Search In Pictures, here are the latest images culled from the web, showing what people eat at the search engine companies, how they play, who they meet, where they speak, what toys they have and more.
Google Black Friday cake:

Google leather luggage tag:

Google’s writing on the wall:
Google cupcakes in a very specific order:

To know more latest update or tips about Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Search Engine Marketing (SEM) - Fill ContactUs Form or call at +44 2032892236 or Email us at - adviser.illusiongroups@gmail.com




7 major mistakes that will derail your CMS project (and how to avoid them)

Break down the challenges you'll face when building a successful CMS project.


Moving to a new CMS is a large endeavor that requires the support and participation from many in your organization. This e-book from eZ Systems provides advice and breaks down the challenges you will inevitably face on your way to building a successful CMS project. Read it and learn how to avoid the most common mistakes you’ll encounter along the way.
This e-book includes:
  • common content migration mistakes;
  • integration advice and project management strategies;
  • 8 simple tips for writing better web content; and more.
Visit Digital Marketing Depot to download this MarTech white paper.
To know more latest update or tips about Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Search Engine Marketing (SEM) - Fill ContactUs Form or call at +44 2032892236 or Email us at - adviser.illusiongroups@gmail.com

Thursday 24 November 2016

Thanksgiving 2016 Google doodle celebrates holiday with American folk art imagery

Google says today's doodle is an ode to this season of togetherness.


Google’s doodle team used American folk art imagery for today’s Thanksgiving Day doodle, depicting simple patterns and shapes for the image.
“Evocative of American folk art, with quilt-like patterning and simple shapes, today’s Doodle, rendered in a rich harvest-colored palette, is an ode to this season of togetherness,” says Google’s Doodle Blog.
Google offered a brief history lesson on the holiday, telling of its origin nearly 400 years ago when American settlers met the Native American Wampanoag tribe:
It was 1620 in Plymouth, Massachusetts when Mayflower colonists and the Wampanoag forged a partnership of necessity. Decimated by an epidemic and wary of the mightier Narragansett, their nearby enemies, the Wampanoag and the newcomers become allies. The pilgrims were unfamiliar with Massachusetts’ natural resources and ill-equipped for survival – but Tisquantum, an English-speaking Patuxet Wampanoag, taught them how to hunt, gather shellfish, and plant corn, beans, and squash. Following harvest in the fall of 1621, the settlers and the Wampanoag, celebrated what’s considered the “First Thanksgiving,” a three-day feast with wild duck, goose, turkey, deer, and barley ale.
Google Doodle Blog
The doodle leads to a search for “Thanksgiving 2016” and includes the usual sharing icon.
Here is a picture of the full doodle currently displaying on Google’s U.S. homepage:
To know more latest update or tips about Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Search Engine Marketing (SEM) - Fill ContactUs Form or call at +44 2032892236 or Email us at - adviser.illusiongroups@gmail.com


The trouble with truth

Do search engines and other content distribution platforms have a responsibility to present information that is true? Columnist Janet Driscoll Miller discusses the issues surrounding this question.


Since the election, there’s been a lot of discussion about fake news and its ability to sway masses into potentially false perceptions. Clearly, creating false perceptions in mass media is a dangerous thing, and it can sway public opinion and policy greatly.
But what about search engines and other content distributors? Even before the US election, German Chancellor Angela Merkel warned that search engine algorithms, “when they are not transparent, can lead to a distortion of our perception, they can shrink our expanse of information.” What responsibility, then, does a search engine have to produce truthful information?

Is Pluto a planet?

Getting at truth can be tough because not everything is black and white, especially in certain subjects. Take, for example, good old Pluto. Many of us grew up learning that Pluto is a planet. Then, in 2006, astronomers ruled that it was no longer a planet.
But in the last few years, Pluto’s planetary designation seems to have been in dispute. As I was helping my daughter with her solar system project for school, I questioned if we should add Pluto as a planet or if it should be left off. What is Pluto’s planetary status now?

Unfortunately, the answer still wasn’t clear. The International Astronomical Union (IAU) determined that Pluto is not a planet because it only meets two of their three criteria for planetary status:
  1. Orbit around the sun (true).
  2. Be spherical (true).
  3. Be the biggest thing in its orbit (not true).
In fall 2014, the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics held a panel discussion on Pluto’s planetary status with several leading experts: Dr. Owen Gingerich, chair the IAU planet definition committee; Dr. Gareth Williams, associate director of the Minor Planet Center; and Dr. Dimitar Sasselov, director of the Harvard Origins of Life Initiative. Interestingly, even Gingerich, who is the chair of the IAU planet definition committee, argued that “a planet is a culturally defined word that changes over time,” and that Pluto is a planet. Two of the three members of the panel, including Gingerich, concluded that Pluto is indeed a planet.
Confused yet? Sometimes there are multiple reputable organizations who debate two potential truths. And that’s OK. Science is about always learning and discovering, and new discoveries may mean that we have to rethink what we once considered fact.

A problem bigger than the smallest planet

While my Pluto example is a fairly harmless and hopefully less controversial example, there are clearly topics in science and beyond that can create dangerous thinking and action based on little or no proven fact.
The issue, especially in science and research, delves much deeper, though. Even if a research study is performed and demonstrates a result, how dependable is that result? Was the methodology and sample size proper? All too often, we see sensational clickbait headlines for studies, as John Oliver shared earlier this year:
Hey, who doesn’t want to drink wine instead of going to the gym?
But the methodology around some of these research reports can be truly suspect. Sweeping generalizations, especially around the health of humans and the environment, can be incredibly dangerous.
In the video segment, Oliver shares a story published by Time magazine, which I would normally consider a reputable source. The article is about a study which, Time claims, suggests that “smelling farts can prevent cancer.” Now, while this particular study actually did not actually make that claim, if you search for “smelling farts can prevent cancer” on Google, here are the results:

Google has even elevated the false information to a Google Answer at the top of the page. In fact, the first result disputing this false claim doesn’t even appear above the scroll line.

The media and clickbait

As Oliver points out in the video, the problem is larger than just users sharing and buying into this information. Rather, there’s a deeper issue at play here, and it centers around what’s popular. Most of us are familiar with clickbait — outrageous headlines created to entice us to click on an article. In an effort to compete to get the most clicks (and thus ad revenue), media outlets have resorted to trying to share the most outrageous news first.
The problem for Google is that much of their algorithm relies on the authority of a site and inbound links to that website. So if a typically authoritative site, such as CNN, posts stories that are not fact-checked, and then we share those links, those two actions are helping to boost the SEO for the incorrect information.
But isn’t it much more fun to think that drinking wine will spare me from having to go to the gym? That’s essentially why we share it.

Why fact checking is hard, manual work

If media outlets and websites aren’t fact checking, how can Google do this? There are certainly a number of sites dedicated to fact checking and rumor validation, such as Snopes and PolitiFact, but they also rely on human editors to pore over articles and fact-check claims.
Last year, Google engineers outlined in a research paper how they might incorporate a truthfulness measurement into the ranking algorithm. But can that really be done? Can a simple algorithm separate truth from fiction?
There are many fact-checking organizations, and there’s even an international network of fact-checkers. But ironically, while there are some mutually agreed-upon best practices, there are no set standards for fact-checking — it can vary by organization. Further, to Oliver’s points in the video, fact-checking different topics requires different standards. A scientific study, for instance, may need to be judged on several standards: methodology, duplication of study and so on, whereas political articles likely require on-the-record quotes to verify.

Treating the cause

Google and Facebook both have started taking steps to eradicate fake news. Google announced it would no longer allow sites with fake news to publish ads on those pages, essentially seeking to cut off potential revenue streams for fake news producers that rely on false clickbait to generate income. That’s certainly one cause of false news generation, but is it the only one?
The issue is much deeper than just ad revenue. One of the scientists in Oliver’s video shares how scientists are incentivized to publish research. The competition in journalism and in science to get “eye-catching” results is real. So the root cause can often be more than just ad revenue — it may be just to get noticed. Or further, it may be to promote an agenda, which falls under the umbrella of propaganda.

The other side of the situation: bias and backlash

So what should Google do? The challenge the search engines (and Facebook) are confronted with is looking biased or being accused of promoting and favoring one side over another. Per Merkel’s comments, this stifles debate as well. And as Google has seen numerous times, and Facebook recently saw this summer with the accusation that its news feed was liberal-leaning, showing more or less of one side of a story may earn the platform a reputation of being biased.
Further, as we’ve established, truth is not always black and white. Merriam-Webster defines truth as “a statement or idea that is true or accepted as true.” So what if I accept something as true that you do not? Truth is not universal in all cases. For example, an atheist believes that God does not exist. This is truth for the atheist.
As one writer commented in an article on Slate.com, “No one — not even Google — wants Google to step in and settle hash that scientists themselves can’t.” Is it really Google’s responsibility to promote only content it deems through an algorithm to be true?
It certainly puts Google in a tough bind. If they quell sites that they believe are not truthful, they may be accused of censorship. If they don’t, they have the power to potentially sway the beliefs of many people who will believe that what they see in Google is true.

Another answer: education

We’ll never stop clickbait. And we’ll never stop fake news. There’s always a way to work the system. Isn’t that what SEOs do? We figure out how to respond to the algorithm and what it wants to rank our sites higher in results. While Google can take steps to try to combat fake news, it will never stop it fully. But should Google stop it completely? That’s a slippery slope.

In conjunction with these efforts, we really have to hold journalism to a higher standard. It starts there. If it sounds too good to be true, you can bet it is. It starts with questioning what we read instead of simply sharing it because it sounds good.
Time for my daily workout: a glass of wine.
To know more latest update or tips about Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Search Engine Marketing (SEM) - Fill ContactUs Form or call at +44 2032892236 or Email us at - adviser.illusiongroups@gmail.com